Long separation is neither a reason to abandon hope nor a basis for promising reconciliation. Its causes and effects must be understood before a treatment plan is proposed.

Where do we start after so much time?

Ask who the child is today, not only who the child was when contact ended. What does the child remember? What information has the child received? What opportunities for contact have remained? Are there legal or safety restrictions?

A parent may still picture the child at the age when regular visits ended. Effective clinical work must take account of the child’s present stage of life and developing understanding.

Allowing room to get to know one another again

Prolonged separation can make renewed contact unfamiliar or intimidating. Parent and child may bring different expectations, memories, and anxieties to the first conversations.

Where treatment is appropriate, Dr. Washam works to understand those differences and to establish conditions in which trust and familiarity may develop.

What if we never really had a relationship to rebuild?

Not every long separation follows the loss of a once-close relationship. Sometimes a parent and child have had little opportunity to know one another at all.

Military service, geographic distance, incarceration, illness, separation during early childhood, or other family circumstances may mean that a meaningful parent-child relationship never fully developed.

When a meaningful bond never had a chance to form, the task may be to build a relationship for the first time rather than to restore an earlier one. The child’s present experience, existing attachments, and needs determine the starting point.

Should we arrange an immediate reunion?

Do not treat an immediate meeting as the inevitable first step. Ask what the clinician would need to understand before recommending any form of contact. If an order limits contact, do not use this website as a reason to depart from it.

Discuss how introductions, communication, and expectations would be handled if treatment were appropriate. The plan should be clear enough that participants are not surprised by who attends or what is expected.

How should I describe the separation?

Prepare dates or approximate periods, the forms of contact that have continued, and the involvement of professionals or courts. Distinguish records you possess from conclusions you have drawn.

There is no need to assemble a persuasive case in the first text message. A brief account of the practical situation helps the practice explain the next stage without inviting extensive disclosure over an ordinary contact channel.

What should our goals be?

Ask how possible goals would be discussed, reviewed, and changed if the process reveals a different need. Restoring contact may be a parent’s hope, but it should not be advertised as a guaranteed result.

An initial clinical assessment, when appropriate, helps clarify whether the proposed treatment and Dr. Washam’s role fit the family’s circumstances.

Sources & further reading

Dr. Charles W. Washam: Professional Statement of Qualifications and Methodology

AFCC and NCJFCJ: Joint Statement on Parent-Child Contact Problems (2022)